<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside previous orders and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner to allow redemption of the revolver with an appropriate redemption fine. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to provide a rationale for determining the fine, considering factors like market price and other relevant information, emphasizing the officer&#039;s discretion in determining the redemption fine and the need to record the reasoning behind the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside previous orders and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner to allow redemption of the revolver with an appropriate redemption fine. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to provide a rationale for determining the fine, considering factors like market price and other relevant information, emphasizing the officer&#039;s discretion in determining the redemption fine and the need to record the reasoning behind the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>