<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs&#039; order regarding the classification of Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) under Project Import against an Import Licence, emphasizing that UPS, while essential, is not inherently part of the computer/micro process system. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,60,000 to Rs. 75,000 based on previous import history, despite the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the essentiality of UPS for micro-processor based instrumentation. The appeal was rejected on all other grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs&#039; order regarding the classification of Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) under Project Import against an Import Licence, emphasizing that UPS, while essential, is not inherently part of the computer/micro process system. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,60,000 to Rs. 75,000 based on previous import history, despite the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the essentiality of UPS for micro-processor based instrumentation. The appeal was rejected on all other grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>