<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 332 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority opinion and the decision of the third member, condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding that the applicant had sufficient cause for the delay due to the department&#039;s failure to provide a certified copy of the order and the applicant&#039;s medical treatment. The appeal was allowed to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 332 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority opinion and the decision of the third member, condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding that the applicant had sufficient cause for the delay due to the department&#039;s failure to provide a certified copy of the order and the applicant&#039;s medical treatment. The appeal was allowed to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>