<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 58 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88187</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the classification of white cement under the Central Excise Tariff for various periods. It upheld the appellants&#039; claims, emphasizing that rapid hardening white cement should not be excluded from the &quot;Rapid Hardening Cement&quot; category. The appellants were granted consequential reliefs without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 58 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88187</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the classification of white cement under the Central Excise Tariff for various periods. It upheld the appellants&#039; claims, emphasizing that rapid hardening white cement should not be excluded from the &quot;Rapid Hardening Cement&quot; category. The appellants were granted consequential reliefs without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>