<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 202 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the order setting aside the confiscation of electric motors and penalty imposition, stating that waiver of notice is not provided for in the Central Excise Act, and any notice issued now would be time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 202 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the order setting aside the confiscation of electric motors and penalty imposition, stating that waiver of notice is not provided for in the Central Excise Act, and any notice issued now would be time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>