<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88173</link>
    <description>Bought-out items such as dust caps, hex nuts and ring washers were treated as component parts of the valves, so their value formed part of the assessable value of the finished goods. Their includibility did not depend on whether they were fitted at the time of clearance or cleared separately, because their character as components remained unchanged. The assessee&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the department&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88173</link>
      <description>Bought-out items such as dust caps, hex nuts and ring washers were treated as component parts of the valves, so their value formed part of the assessable value of the finished goods. Their includibility did not depend on whether they were fitted at the time of clearance or cleared separately, because their character as components remained unchanged. The assessee&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the department&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>