<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88134</link>
    <description>Classification of a desoldering pump had to be determined by its technical characteristics, commercial understanding and the relevant tariff notes, not by personal observation alone. The product was used with soldering work on printed circuit boards to suck molten solder, and the technical opinions on record supported treatment as an accessory to soldering rather than a hand tool. On that basis, Heading 8467.00 was inapplicable, and the attempt to reclassify it from the department&#039;s earlier accepted classification was not justified. The accompanying allegations of suppression, the extended period demand, confiscation and penalty were therefore unsustainable on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88134</link>
      <description>Classification of a desoldering pump had to be determined by its technical characteristics, commercial understanding and the relevant tariff notes, not by personal observation alone. The product was used with soldering work on printed circuit boards to suck molten solder, and the technical opinions on record supported treatment as an accessory to soldering rather than a hand tool. On that basis, Heading 8467.00 was inapplicable, and the attempt to reclassify it from the department&#039;s earlier accepted classification was not justified. The accompanying allegations of suppression, the extended period demand, confiscation and penalty were therefore unsustainable on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>