<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88125</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that engineering service charges not directly linked to manufactured items should not be included in the assessable value under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the demand for differential duty and penalty. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurately determining components contributing to the value of goods, distinguishing between services related to plant layout and those tied to manufactured items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88125</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that engineering service charges not directly linked to manufactured items should not be included in the assessable value under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the demand for differential duty and penalty. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurately determining components contributing to the value of goods, distinguishing between services related to plant layout and those tied to manufactured items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>