<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 335 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88112</link>
    <description>ProBoFex capsule and liquid were classified as prepared or preserved foods put up in unit containers under Item 1B of the old Central Excise Tariff, because the product was treated as a food supplement rather than a drug or medicinal preparation. The Tribunal relied on a State Food and Drug Administration certificate stating that it was not a drug under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and followed earlier classification decisions for comparable products. A later contrary ruling was distinguished as not controlling. The residuary Item 68 was therefore inapplicable, and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 335 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88112</link>
      <description>ProBoFex capsule and liquid were classified as prepared or preserved foods put up in unit containers under Item 1B of the old Central Excise Tariff, because the product was treated as a food supplement rather than a drug or medicinal preparation. The Tribunal relied on a State Food and Drug Administration certificate stating that it was not a drug under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and followed earlier classification decisions for comparable products. A later contrary ruling was distinguished as not controlling. The residuary Item 68 was therefore inapplicable, and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>