<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88107</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured with a deliberately unfilled gap for fitting a sewing machine were treated as specially designed sewing machine bases, not as ordinary block boards. Their specific design and exclusive intended use were decisive for tariff classification, because the article was not marketable for general block-board use. On that basis, the goods fell outside Heading 4408.90 and were classified under Heading 8452 as sewing machine parts, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88107</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured with a deliberately unfilled gap for fitting a sewing machine were treated as specially designed sewing machine bases, not as ordinary block boards. Their specific design and exclusive intended use were decisive for tariff classification, because the article was not marketable for general block-board use. On that basis, the goods fell outside Heading 4408.90 and were classified under Heading 8452 as sewing machine parts, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>