<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88100</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals as the imported goods were not classified under Tariff Heading 90.21 as hearing aids or related components, rendering them ineligible for the concessional duty under Notification No. 71/86-C.E. The decision of the Collector, Customs (Appeals) was upheld, denying the benefit of the notification for Countervailing Duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:44:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88100</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals as the imported goods were not classified under Tariff Heading 90.21 as hearing aids or related components, rendering them ineligible for the concessional duty under Notification No. 71/86-C.E. The decision of the Collector, Customs (Appeals) was upheld, denying the benefit of the notification for Countervailing Duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>