<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88061</link>
    <description>Feasibility charges, system analysis or designing charges, and service charges were treated as potentially similar to consultancy and demonstration charges already excluded from assessable value, but the basis for distinguishing them was not clearly explained. The optional nature of the feasibility charges was not examined on merits, and the nexus of the disputed charges with design or marketability was not properly analysed in light of the applicable case law. The matter was therefore remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration of the three items on the merits after allowing the assessee to substantiate its claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88061</link>
      <description>Feasibility charges, system analysis or designing charges, and service charges were treated as potentially similar to consultancy and demonstration charges already excluded from assessable value, but the basis for distinguishing them was not clearly explained. The optional nature of the feasibility charges was not examined on merits, and the nexus of the disputed charges with design or marketability was not properly analysed in light of the applicable case law. The matter was therefore remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration of the three items on the merits after allowing the assessee to substantiate its claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>