<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 284 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88031</link>
    <description>An adjudication cannot stand where the assessee&#039;s objections to stock-taking, discrepancy calculations, annexures, worksheets and relied-on documents are rejected without proper examination. The record indicated that the lower authorities treated the explanations as an afterthought without addressing the stock-taking method or giving the assessee copies of the worksheets and a fair chance to meet the departmental material. Such non-application of mind vitiates the order. The impugned orders were therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration, with directions to allow fresh replies and a reasoned decision on the objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:43:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 284 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88031</link>
      <description>An adjudication cannot stand where the assessee&#039;s objections to stock-taking, discrepancy calculations, annexures, worksheets and relied-on documents are rejected without proper examination. The record indicated that the lower authorities treated the explanations as an afterthought without addressing the stock-taking method or giving the assessee copies of the worksheets and a fair chance to meet the departmental material. Such non-application of mind vitiates the order. The impugned orders were therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration, with directions to allow fresh replies and a reasoned decision on the objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>