https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88007 The court ruled in favor of the applicant in a case concerning duty amount and assessable value of EOT cranes. The charges for erection, commissioning, and testing were held not includible in the assessable value, following a precedent. The excisability of the goods was affirmed, and the limitation period defense was rejected due to alleged suppression of facts. The applicant's deposit of duty, penalty, and interest was waived, and an early hearing was requested and scheduled for July 1997. en-us Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:46:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88007 The court ruled in favor of the applicant in a case concerning duty amount and assessable value of EOT cranes. The charges for erection, commissioning, and testing were held not includible in the assessable value, following a precedent. The excisability of the goods was affirmed, and the limitation period defense was rejected due to alleged suppression of facts. The applicant's deposit of duty, penalty, and interest was waived, and an early hearing was requested and scheduled for July 1997. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88007