<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 429 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87978</link>
    <description>Steel plates, angles, bars and ceramic tiles were considered prima facie to be constructional materials rather than machinery, accessories or parts of machines, so eligibility for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q was not established at the interim stage. On that prima facie view, the balance of convenience was found to favour the Revenue, and conditional protection was granted only on part deposit of the disputed amount and furnishing of a bank guarantee for the balance. Stay against recovery and waiver of the remaining pre-deposit were therefore made subject to compliance with those conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 429 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87978</link>
      <description>Steel plates, angles, bars and ceramic tiles were considered prima facie to be constructional materials rather than machinery, accessories or parts of machines, so eligibility for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q was not established at the interim stage. On that prima facie view, the balance of convenience was found to favour the Revenue, and conditional protection was granted only on part deposit of the disputed amount and furnishing of a bank guarantee for the balance. Stay against recovery and waiver of the remaining pre-deposit were therefore made subject to compliance with those conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>