<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 269 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87970</link>
    <description>Coated cotton fabrics were treated as classifiable under Heading 5903 rather than Heading 3921.19, because the Government and Board had issued a circular directing classification under Heading 5903 and the later administrative position was supported by the Supreme Court decision referred to in the order. The earlier classification adopted by the authorities under Heading 3921.19 was therefore not followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:05:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 269 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87970</link>
      <description>Coated cotton fabrics were treated as classifiable under Heading 5903 rather than Heading 3921.19, because the Government and Board had issued a circular directing classification under Heading 5903 and the later administrative position was supported by the Supreme Court decision referred to in the order. The earlier classification adopted by the authorities under Heading 3921.19 was therefore not followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>