<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87967</link>
    <description>A stay order requiring deposit in instalments was sought to be modified on the basis of alleged financial hardship and claimed errors in the earlier order. The modification request was not accepted on merits, but the time for depositing the first and second instalments was extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:59:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87967</link>
      <description>A stay order requiring deposit in instalments was sought to be modified on the basis of alleged financial hardship and claimed errors in the earlier order. The modification request was not accepted on merits, but the time for depositing the first and second instalments was extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>