https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87963 The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Central Excise for further examination as evidence of marketability was lacking for the product, magnesium bisulphite. The issue of stability remained unresolved due to insufficient evidence presented by the appellant. The demand for duty was set aside as time-barred since there was no evidence of wilful misstatement or evasion. The penalty imposed on the appellant was also overturned as there was no justification for it based on the circumstances of the case. en-us Mon, 16 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87963 The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Central Excise for further examination as evidence of marketability was lacking for the product, magnesium bisulphite. The issue of stability remained unresolved due to insufficient evidence presented by the appellant. The demand for duty was set aside as time-barred since there was no evidence of wilful misstatement or evasion. The penalty imposed on the appellant was also overturned as there was no justification for it based on the circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87963