<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 149 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87946</link>
    <description>Eligibility of chlorine cylinders for capital goods Modvat credit under Rule 57Q required a detailed examination of their design and function in the manufacturing process, which could not be fully undertaken at the stay stage. The cited Commissioner&#039;s decision was not binding, and the Tribunal ruling relied on did not concern Rule 57Q. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but partial relief was granted through a conditional deposit, with the balance of duty and penalty stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:35:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 149 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87946</link>
      <description>Eligibility of chlorine cylinders for capital goods Modvat credit under Rule 57Q required a detailed examination of their design and function in the manufacturing process, which could not be fully undertaken at the stay stage. The cited Commissioner&#039;s decision was not binding, and the Tribunal ruling relied on did not concern Rule 57Q. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but partial relief was granted through a conditional deposit, with the balance of duty and penalty stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>