<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87945</link>
    <description>Interest on receivables and turnover discount, whether given in cash or kind, were treated as deductible in determining assessable value, and deduction could not be denied merely because the discount was quantified only at the end of the relevant period. Deduction for breakages during transit was also accepted where the price collected already reflected the breakage value. By contrast, discount linked to expiry of goods in wholesalers&#039; hands was not deductible, because the loss was borne by the wholesaler after delivery and any concession by the manufacturer was treated as sales promotion rather than a price-related allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87945</link>
      <description>Interest on receivables and turnover discount, whether given in cash or kind, were treated as deductible in determining assessable value, and deduction could not be denied merely because the discount was quantified only at the end of the relevant period. Deduction for breakages during transit was also accepted where the price collected already reflected the breakage value. By contrast, discount linked to expiry of goods in wholesalers&#039; hands was not deductible, because the loss was borne by the wholesaler after delivery and any concession by the manufacturer was treated as sales promotion rather than a price-related allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>