<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 133 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87930</link>
    <description>Staple pins were classified under Heading 73.31 rather than Heading 83.01/15(2) because the issue was already covered by a High Court decision on similar goods. The pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court did not justify departing from that classification. The earlier High Court ruling was followed, and the classification question was treated as settled in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:26:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 133 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87930</link>
      <description>Staple pins were classified under Heading 73.31 rather than Heading 83.01/15(2) because the issue was already covered by a High Court decision on similar goods. The pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court did not justify departing from that classification. The earlier High Court ruling was followed, and the classification question was treated as settled in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>