https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87927 In a Modvat credit dispute, the applicants argued that substantive credit should not be denied for procedural non-compliance, despite the admitted absence of prior permission before clearing packing material. The tribunal found the objection arguable but held that the rival contentions required examination of the case law and evidence before final relief could be considered. Interim protection against recovery was therefore continued only on condition of a deposit, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:18:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87927 In a Modvat credit dispute, the applicants argued that substantive credit should not be denied for procedural non-compliance, despite the admitted absence of prior permission before clearing packing material. The tribunal found the objection arguable but held that the rival contentions required examination of the case law and evidence before final relief could be considered. Interim protection against recovery was therefore continued only on condition of a deposit, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87927