<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 267 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87910</link>
    <description>Bearing caps were treated as parts of diesel-operated internal combustion engines rather than as goods of Chapter Heading 73.08, because a mistaken classification entry could not change their true tariff identity. On that basis, they fell under Chapter Heading 84.09, and since the Chapter X procedure had been followed during the relevant period, Notification No. 217/85 applied. The exemption was therefore correctly granted and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:16:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 267 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87910</link>
      <description>Bearing caps were treated as parts of diesel-operated internal combustion engines rather than as goods of Chapter Heading 73.08, because a mistaken classification entry could not change their true tariff identity. On that basis, they fell under Chapter Heading 84.09, and since the Chapter X procedure had been followed during the relevant period, Notification No. 217/85 applied. The exemption was therefore correctly granted and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>