<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87908</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of duty and penalty may be waived where the demand rests only on a formula-based estimate of production and the department has not produced prima facie evidence of clandestine removal. A mere shortage computed from a guideline linking concentrate input to output, without corroboration of suppression, removals, or other supporting material, does not by itself justify insisting on deposit. On that footing, no prima facie case for penalty was shown, and recovery was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:10:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87908</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of duty and penalty may be waived where the demand rests only on a formula-based estimate of production and the department has not produced prima facie evidence of clandestine removal. A mere shortage computed from a guideline linking concentrate input to output, without corroboration of suppression, removals, or other supporting material, does not by itself justify insisting on deposit. On that footing, no prima facie case for penalty was shown, and recovery was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>