<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87888</link>
    <description>Excise valuation must reflect the net price actually realised where Modvat credit is contractually passed on to the buyer by reducing the sale price. The contract and price list showed a trade discount linked to Modvat benefit, and there was no specific factual challenge to that position. On that basis, duty was required to be computed after deducting the amount equal to the Modvat credit from the gross price, making the higher demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:01:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87888</link>
      <description>Excise valuation must reflect the net price actually realised where Modvat credit is contractually passed on to the buyer by reducing the sale price. The contract and price list showed a trade discount linked to Modvat benefit, and there was no specific factual challenge to that position. On that basis, duty was required to be computed after deducting the amount equal to the Modvat credit from the gross price, making the higher demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>