<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87880</link>
    <description>Where an appeal is dispatched within the limitation period by registered post and its late receipt is due to postal transit, the delay may be condoned if the appellant acted diligently. On that basis, the first appellate authority&#039;s rejection of the appeal as time-barred was set aside, the delay was condoned, and the matter was remanded for disposal on merits after affording a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:34:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87880</link>
      <description>Where an appeal is dispatched within the limitation period by registered post and its late receipt is due to postal transit, the delay may be condoned if the appellant acted diligently. On that basis, the first appellate authority&#039;s rejection of the appeal as time-barred was set aside, the delay was condoned, and the matter was remanded for disposal on merits after affording a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>