<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 235 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87878</link>
    <description>Forged articles that had been machined, drilled and bored, and whose samples were proof-machined, were treated as having acquired their essential final shape; they were therefore not mere rough forgings and fell for excise classification under the relevant tariff headings. The record showed no further substantial processing after removal from the factory to convert them into finished products, supporting excisability. On the question of consequential liabilities, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced because the goods remained in the factory and there was no allegation of removal without payment of duty, making the original monetary sanctions excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 235 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87878</link>
      <description>Forged articles that had been machined, drilled and bored, and whose samples were proof-machined, were treated as having acquired their essential final shape; they were therefore not mere rough forgings and fell for excise classification under the relevant tariff headings. The record showed no further substantial processing after removal from the factory to convert them into finished products, supporting excisability. On the question of consequential liabilities, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced because the goods remained in the factory and there was no allegation of removal without payment of duty, making the original monetary sanctions excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>