<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, denying the appellants&#039; claim for exemption under Notification No. 204/76-Cus. The imported Winchester Disk Drives (WDD) were found to be brand new and not the ones sent for repairs, leading to the rejection of the exemption. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the imposition of customs duty and a redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, denying the appellants&#039; claim for exemption under Notification No. 204/76-Cus. The imported Winchester Disk Drives (WDD) were found to be brand new and not the ones sent for repairs, leading to the rejection of the exemption. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the imposition of customs duty and a redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>