<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87826</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the input fell under the tariff heading already declared and the Department had been informed through the declaration and clarificatory letter that copper wire bars were being received for use in manufacture. On a combined reading of those documents, the declaration requirement was treated as substantially complied with, so the credit was held admissible and denial was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87826</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the input fell under the tariff heading already declared and the Department had been informed through the declaration and clarificatory letter that copper wire bars were being received for use in manufacture. On a combined reading of those documents, the declaration requirement was treated as substantially complied with, so the credit was held admissible and denial was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>