https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87825 Re-export was treated as permissible without redemption fine where the disputed goods were held up by a classification controversy, the buyer had cancelled the order because of clearance delay, and similar goods had been cleared before and after on the same classification claimed by the importer. As the impugned order was only an assessment order on classification and not a confiscation order, there was no legal basis to demand redemption fine as a condition for re-export. The factual justification for re-export was therefore accepted, and the goods were permitted to be re-exported without any redemption fine. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:53:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87825 Re-export was treated as permissible without redemption fine where the disputed goods were held up by a classification controversy, the buyer had cancelled the order because of clearance delay, and similar goods had been cleared before and after on the same classification claimed by the importer. As the impugned order was only an assessment order on classification and not a confiscation order, there was no legal basis to demand redemption fine as a condition for re-export. The factual justification for re-export was therefore accepted, and the goods were permitted to be re-exported without any redemption fine. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87825