<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87817</link>
    <description>Garnetting of duty-paid waste to obtain yarn was treated as not amounting to manufacture in the legal sense, so no duty could be sustained on that process. The Tribunal followed an earlier decision holding that garnetting is not a manufacturing process and also noted the Board&#039;s circular on the subject. On that basis, it found no reason to uphold the demand, set aside the impugned order, and granted relief to the assessee on the substantive issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87817</link>
      <description>Garnetting of duty-paid waste to obtain yarn was treated as not amounting to manufacture in the legal sense, so no duty could be sustained on that process. The Tribunal followed an earlier decision holding that garnetting is not a manufacturing process and also noted the Board&#039;s circular on the subject. On that basis, it found no reason to uphold the demand, set aside the impugned order, and granted relief to the assessee on the substantive issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>