<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 271 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87813</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal based on the issue of broken glazed tiles not being excisable waste material, which had been previously decided in another case. The appellants, although not present, had submitted written submissions citing a previous Tribunal decision and a Supreme Court ruling. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, relying on the precedent set by the previous decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 271 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87813</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal based on the issue of broken glazed tiles not being excisable waste material, which had been previously decided in another case. The appellants, although not present, had submitted written submissions citing a previous Tribunal decision and a Supreme Court ruling. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, relying on the precedent set by the previous decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>