<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 249 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that duty is not payable on bought-out items or on the value of the entire contract less charges for erection and commissioning. It held that the plant or equipment, upon erection, became immovable property and not marketable goods. The decision emphasized that re-assembly at the site is not an excisable activity, and the Collector&#039;s findings on the inclusion of bought-out items in the assessable value were not valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 249 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that duty is not payable on bought-out items or on the value of the entire contract less charges for erection and commissioning. It held that the plant or equipment, upon erection, became immovable property and not marketable goods. The decision emphasized that re-assembly at the site is not an excisable activity, and the Collector&#039;s findings on the inclusion of bought-out items in the assessable value were not valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>