https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87758 The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable post-dissolution of the partnership firm, acknowledged potential reductions in duty demand based on Modvat credit and cum-duty price, recognized the evidence supporting the demand, and ordered a pre-deposit considering the appellants' financial claims and the scale of unaccounted transactions. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit specified amounts towards duty and penalty, with the balance amounts stayed pending appeal. Compliance was required by specific dates in June 1997. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:26:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87758 The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable post-dissolution of the partnership firm, acknowledged potential reductions in duty demand based on Modvat credit and cum-duty price, recognized the evidence supporting the demand, and ordered a pre-deposit considering the appellants' financial claims and the scale of unaccounted transactions. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit specified amounts towards duty and penalty, with the balance amounts stayed pending appeal. Compliance was required by specific dates in June 1997. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87758