https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87757 Repeated opportunities to inspect relied-upon documents, file replies and attend hearing defeated the plea of denial of natural justice, and the adjudication was treated as valid. The processing of fabrics by pre-shrinking, scouring, heat-setting, drying and stentering was held to fall within dutiable textile processing and therefore amounted to manufacture; the extended period for demand was also held invocable. Classification and exemption under Notification No. 35/84-C.E. were not finally determined on the existing record and were remitted for reconsideration, with consequential redetermination of duty and penalty. en-us Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:22:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87757 Repeated opportunities to inspect relied-upon documents, file replies and attend hearing defeated the plea of denial of natural justice, and the adjudication was treated as valid. The processing of fabrics by pre-shrinking, scouring, heat-setting, drying and stentering was held to fall within dutiable textile processing and therefore amounted to manufacture; the extended period for demand was also held invocable. Classification and exemption under Notification No. 35/84-C.E. were not finally determined on the existing record and were remitted for reconsideration, with consequential redetermination of duty and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87757