<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 263 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87756</link>
    <description>Refractory bricks and binding accessories used in an electric arc furnace were treated as parts of machinery or furnace installation, so they were not excluded from Modvat eligibility under Rule 57A. The assessee&#039;s omission to file a declaration under Rule 57G(1) did not defeat the claim in the special facts, because relevant particulars had already been furnished under Rule 57T for capital goods treatment and contemporaneous Tribunal decisions made Rule 57A relief impracticable to claim earlier. Rule 57Q was left undecided. Modvat credit was therefore admissible and the demand confirmations could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 263 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87756</link>
      <description>Refractory bricks and binding accessories used in an electric arc furnace were treated as parts of machinery or furnace installation, so they were not excluded from Modvat eligibility under Rule 57A. The assessee&#039;s omission to file a declaration under Rule 57G(1) did not defeat the claim in the special facts, because relevant particulars had already been furnished under Rule 57T for capital goods treatment and contemporaneous Tribunal decisions made Rule 57A relief impracticable to claim earlier. Rule 57Q was left undecided. Modvat credit was therefore admissible and the demand confirmations could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>