<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 298 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87751</link>
    <description>Moisturex was analysed for tariff classification as either a medicament under sub-heading 3003.10 or a cosmetic under Heading 33.04. The product&#039;s formulation contained urea, lactic acid and other ingredients indicated for ichthyosis vulgaris, fissure foot and dry scaly skin, while the label, product literature and dosage directions supported therapeutic use on affected areas. Medical affidavits and pharmaceutical material were relied on to show that urea was present in therapeutic quantity and that the product was intended to treat skin disorders rather than to cleanse, beautify or promote attractiveness. On that basis, it was treated as a medicament and not as a cosmetic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:06:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 298 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87751</link>
      <description>Moisturex was analysed for tariff classification as either a medicament under sub-heading 3003.10 or a cosmetic under Heading 33.04. The product&#039;s formulation contained urea, lactic acid and other ingredients indicated for ichthyosis vulgaris, fissure foot and dry scaly skin, while the label, product literature and dosage directions supported therapeutic use on affected areas. Medical affidavits and pharmaceutical material were relied on to show that urea was present in therapeutic quantity and that the product was intended to treat skin disorders rather than to cleanse, beautify or promote attractiveness. On that basis, it was treated as a medicament and not as a cosmetic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>