<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 309 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87745</link>
    <description>Duty demand cannot be sustained merely because records were incomplete or material was treated as consumed in manufacture; proof of removal without payment of duty remains essential. The commentary further notes that where the order does not contain a reasoned determination on the extent of forging loss, if any, to be disallowed, the matter requires fresh examination. A speaking order is necessary to support any disallowance and consequent demand. The dispute was therefore remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication and a reasoned decision on the loss issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:50:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 309 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87745</link>
      <description>Duty demand cannot be sustained merely because records were incomplete or material was treated as consumed in manufacture; proof of removal without payment of duty remains essential. The commentary further notes that where the order does not contain a reasoned determination on the extent of forging loss, if any, to be disallowed, the matter requires fresh examination. A speaking order is necessary to support any disallowance and consequent demand. The dispute was therefore remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication and a reasoned decision on the loss issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>