<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87723</link>
    <description>Lime/lime fines classification required fresh scrutiny because the item had been classified differently across periods and the departmental stand for the disputed period was unsupported by reasons. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo consideration, with directions to the adjudicating authority to hear the appellants and pass a fresh speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87723</link>
      <description>Lime/lime fines classification required fresh scrutiny because the item had been classified differently across periods and the departmental stand for the disputed period was unsupported by reasons. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo consideration, with directions to the adjudicating authority to hear the appellants and pass a fresh speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>