https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87709 The Tribunal found the Assistant Commissioner's rejection of the refund claim for duty on damaged imported goods to be a violation of judicial discipline. The Tribunal emphasized the Department's responsibility to assess the damaged goods' value for abatement purposes and directed the adjudicating authority to accept the value determined by the surveyor, granting the refund. The order was allowed, and a copy was forwarded to the Central Board of Excise and Customs for necessary action. en-us Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:35:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87709 The Tribunal found the Assistant Commissioner's rejection of the refund claim for duty on damaged imported goods to be a violation of judicial discipline. The Tribunal emphasized the Department's responsibility to assess the damaged goods' value for abatement purposes and directed the adjudicating authority to accept the value determined by the surveyor, granting the refund. The order was allowed, and a copy was forwarded to the Central Board of Excise and Customs for necessary action. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87709