<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87692</link>
    <description>CEGAT, New Delhi found that the earlier order rested on a mistaken understanding of the classification issue and that this error was apparent from the record. The Tribunal also noted that the party had received notice of hearing after the hearing date, but the decisive point was the incorrect premise on which the earlier conclusion had been reached. Treating the error as one warranting rectification, the Tribunal recalled the prior order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:28:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87692</link>
      <description>CEGAT, New Delhi found that the earlier order rested on a mistaken understanding of the classification issue and that this error was apparent from the record. The Tribunal also noted that the party had received notice of hearing after the hearing date, but the decisive point was the incorrect premise on which the earlier conclusion had been reached. Treating the error as one warranting rectification, the Tribunal recalled the prior order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>