<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87691</link>
    <description>Evidence from customer statements and the appellants&#039; own partners showed that goods invoiced as CRGO rolls and Torridel core were in substance electrical laminations supplied in coil and strip form. On that evidentiary basis, the finding of clandestine removal was sustained and the duty demand was upheld. However, considering the quantum of duty involved and the surrounding circumstances, the penalty was found excessive and was reduced to Rs. 25,000 in each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:26:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87691</link>
      <description>Evidence from customer statements and the appellants&#039; own partners showed that goods invoiced as CRGO rolls and Torridel core were in substance electrical laminations supplied in coil and strip form. On that evidentiary basis, the finding of clandestine removal was sustained and the duty demand was upheld. However, considering the quantum of duty involved and the surrounding circumstances, the penalty was found excessive and was reduced to Rs. 25,000 in each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>