<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 195 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87682</link>
    <description>Where sub-standard inputs are cleared as such without being used in manufacture, payment of duty on clearance by reversing the Modvat credit satisfies Rule 57F(1). The fact that the credit was not reversed immediately on discovery of the defect was held immaterial because the statutory condition was met at the time of clearance. On that basis, the demand for penalty could not be sustained merely for delay in reversal, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 195 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87682</link>
      <description>Where sub-standard inputs are cleared as such without being used in manufacture, payment of duty on clearance by reversing the Modvat credit satisfies Rule 57F(1). The fact that the credit was not reversed immediately on discovery of the defect was held immaterial because the statutory condition was met at the time of clearance. On that basis, the demand for penalty could not be sustained merely for delay in reversal, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>