https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87676 Notice of hearing was found to have been duly issued and endorsed to counsel, and the appellant's own communication confirmed attendance on the scheduled date, so the plea of denial of personal hearing failed. The chemical test and Central Revenue Control Laboratory retest both showed non-cellulosic fibre content above one-sixth by weight in the representative sample, and the alternative textile commissioner's report was not shown to concern the same goods or sampling method. On that basis, the yarn was correctly classifiable under Item No. 18-III(ii) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. en-us Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:52:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87676 Notice of hearing was found to have been duly issued and endorsed to counsel, and the appellant's own communication confirmed attendance on the scheduled date, so the plea of denial of personal hearing failed. The chemical test and Central Revenue Control Laboratory retest both showed non-cellulosic fibre content above one-sixth by weight in the representative sample, and the alternative textile commissioner's report was not shown to concern the same goods or sampling method. On that basis, the yarn was correctly classifiable under Item No. 18-III(ii) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87676