<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 244 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87666</link>
    <description>A trade notice or departmental instruction cannot enlarge a statutory classification rule unless the statute expressly authorises such extension; because the claimed Board instructions were not produced and were not issued under Section 37B, the penalty could not be sustained and was set aside. A separate remark in the order dropping the duty demand did not cause prejudice or affect rights where no confirmed demand survived and the matter was already covered by earlier Tribunal authority, so expunction was not warranted. The duty demand remained dropped, while only the penalty failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 244 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87666</link>
      <description>A trade notice or departmental instruction cannot enlarge a statutory classification rule unless the statute expressly authorises such extension; because the claimed Board instructions were not produced and were not issued under Section 37B, the penalty could not be sustained and was set aside. A separate remark in the order dropping the duty demand did not cause prejudice or affect rights where no confirmed demand survived and the matter was already covered by earlier Tribunal authority, so expunction was not warranted. The duty demand remained dropped, while only the penalty failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>