<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87587</link>
    <description>Under the Modvat scheme, a declaration describing inputs as copper scrap was held sufficient to cover brass scrap, because brass is an alloy of copper and zinc and there was no separate tariff entry for brass scrap. Applying Section Note 4 of Section XV, the Tribunal treated a reference to copper as including its alloys unless the context otherwise required. On that basis, brass scrap fell within the declared description and Modvat credit was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87587</link>
      <description>Under the Modvat scheme, a declaration describing inputs as copper scrap was held sufficient to cover brass scrap, because brass is an alloy of copper and zinc and there was no separate tariff entry for brass scrap. Applying Section Note 4 of Section XV, the Tribunal treated a reference to copper as including its alloys unless the context otherwise required. On that basis, brass scrap fell within the declared description and Modvat credit was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>