https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87575 The judge rejected the Department's appeal and upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to the terms of the security bond for the production of goods before imposing confiscation or redemption fines. The judge highlighted that without the availability of goods for confiscation, no order of confiscation or redemption fine can be issued. Strict adherence to bond terms for provisional release of seized goods was deemed crucial, and any order of confiscation without directing the goods' production would contradict the bond terms. The judgment underscored the significance of following bond requirements in such cases, in line with Tribunal decisions. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:44:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87575 The judge rejected the Department's appeal and upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to the terms of the security bond for the production of goods before imposing confiscation or redemption fines. The judge highlighted that without the availability of goods for confiscation, no order of confiscation or redemption fine can be issued. Strict adherence to bond terms for provisional release of seized goods was deemed crucial, and any order of confiscation without directing the goods' production would contradict the bond terms. The judgment underscored the significance of following bond requirements in such cases, in line with Tribunal decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87575