<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 373 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87545</link>
    <description>A refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act is not barred merely because duty was paid on approved price lists. Where assessment has attained finality, the refund issue can still be examined under the statute, and failure to separately challenge the approved price list does not preclude consideration of the claim. On that basis, the refund claim was held maintainable and the refund direction was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 373 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87545</link>
      <description>A refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act is not barred merely because duty was paid on approved price lists. Where assessment has attained finality, the refund issue can still be examined under the statute, and failure to separately challenge the approved price list does not preclude consideration of the claim. On that basis, the refund claim was held maintainable and the refund direction was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>