<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87528</link>
    <description>Penalty cannot be sustained where the show cause notice does not propose penal action or allege the contravention attracting penalty. A notice referring only to Rule 57E, which governs recovery of wrongly taken credit, without invoking any penal provision, fails to put the noticee on notice of possible penalty. The stated conclusion is that the penalty order was unsustainable and penalty was not imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:00:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87528</link>
      <description>Penalty cannot be sustained where the show cause notice does not propose penal action or allege the contravention attracting penalty. A notice referring only to Rule 57E, which governs recovery of wrongly taken credit, without invoking any penal provision, fails to put the noticee on notice of possible penalty. The stated conclusion is that the penalty order was unsustainable and penalty was not imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>