<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87526</link>
    <description>Section 15(1)(a) of the Customs Act fixes the rate of duty for goods entered for home consumption by reference to the date the bill of entry is presented, not the date of arrival of the consignment. Because the bill of entry was filed after Notification No. 69/87 had been rescinded, the exemption benefit was unavailable. The date of landing did not govern duty liability where the statute makes presentation of the bill of entry the relevant date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87526</link>
      <description>Section 15(1)(a) of the Customs Act fixes the rate of duty for goods entered for home consumption by reference to the date the bill of entry is presented, not the date of arrival of the consignment. Because the bill of entry was filed after Notification No. 69/87 had been rescinded, the exemption benefit was unavailable. The date of landing did not govern duty liability where the statute makes presentation of the bill of entry the relevant date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>